Market value and deconstruction.

Probably should have caught this earlier, but it was buried in the stacks. From the Nov. 10 New Yorker, John Lanchester writes:

“If the invention of derivatives was the financial world’s modernist dawn, the current crisis is unsettlingly like the birth of postmodernism. For anyone who studied literature in college in the past few decades, there is a weird familiarity about the current crisis: value, in the realm of finance capital, evokes the elusive nature of meaning in deconstructionism. According to Jacques Derrida, the doyen of the school, meaning can never be precisely located; instead, it is always ‘deferred,’ moved elsewhere, located in other meanings, which refer and defer to other meanings—a snake permanently and necessarily eating its own tail. This process is fluid and constant, but at moments the perpetual process of deferral stalls and collapses in on itself. Derrida called this moment an ‘aporia,’ from a Greek term meaning ‘impasse.’ There is something both amusing and appalling about seeing his theories acted out in the world markets to such cataclysmic effect. Anyone invited to attend a meeting of the G-8 financial ministers would be well advised not to draw their attention to this.”

You know, not too long ago I might have scoffed at anyone who tried seriously to compare Warren Buffet and Jacques Derrida. In light of current events, it seems to make sense.

(Is the gold standard the transcendent signifier?)